Affichage des articles dont le libellé est security. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est security. Afficher tous les articles

jeudi 30 avril 2015

Hackers can steal fingerprints from a Galaxy S5

You may not be the only one swiping fingerprints on your Galaxy S5. Criminals could be doing it, too, and without your knowledge.
Researchers at FireEye discovered a serious flaw in some Androidphones — not just the Galaxy S5, though other affected models weren’t named. While fingerprint data is locked away in Android’s trusted storage area, the biometric scanner itself is exposed. With the right access, a criminal can perform a man-in-the-middle attack and siphon off scans while they’re in transit.
Resident malware does the dirty work silently in the background. Once criminals have acquired those tasty bits, “you can generate the image of [the] fingerprint,” Yulong Zhang explained. He added “after that you can do whatever you want.”

 Galaxy s5

Scary, right? It would be, if not for a few important caveats. First, this particular flaw was fixed in Android 5.0. Most new devices are shipping with Lollipop pre-installed, and it’s been rolling out to more older devices lately. If your carrier has already updated your handset, you’re good.
Second, FireEye’s researchers say that an attacker needs to be able to “break the kernel” in order to gain the required access to a phone’s fingerprint scanner. Unless you’ve rooted your device, you probably aren’t in harm’s way when it comes to this particular exploit.
That malware would also have to find its way onto your phone somehow, and if you’re only installing apps from the Play Store the chances of that happening are pretty slim. Samsung is, nevertheless, investigating FireEye’s claims.
As worrisome as this exploit is, it’s much scarier to think that someone with access to the right lab equipment can reproduce your fingerprint with nothing more than a photo they found on the Internet.

New Browser Hack Can Spy On Eight Out Of Ten PCs






A group of Columbia University security researchers have uncovered a new and insidious way for a hacker to spy on a computer, Web app or virtual machine running in the cloud without being detected. Any computer running a late-model Intel microprocessor and a Web browser using HTML5 (i.e., 80% of all PCs in the world) is vulnerable to this attack.
The exploit, which the researchers are calling “the spy in the sandbox,” requires little in the way of cost or time on the part of the attacker; there’s nothing to install and no need to break into hardened systems. All a hacker has to do is lure a victim to an untrusted web page with content controlled by the attacker. Once there, the software inside the bogus content launches a program that  manipulates how data moves in and out of a victim PC’s cache, which is the part of the CPU that serves as the intermediary between the high-speed central processor and the lower-speed random access memory or RAM.

The exploit then records the time it takes for the victim’s PC to run various operations in the cache memory, using the browser’s own high-resolution timers (we’re talking nanoseconds here). By studying the time it takes for memory access to take place, the hacker can get an accurate picture about a user’s browser history, keystrokes and mouse movements. The attack is more for spying than theft: it doesn’t steal any data or passwords or corrupt the victim’s machine.

The “spy in the sandbox” is what’s known as a side-channel attack, which is one of the older tricks in the hacker’s black bag. Such an attack usually involves interpreting what’s going inside a computer guts by measuring physical outputs such as sound, electromagnetic radiation or power consumption. In the 1980s, Soviet spies reportedly were suspected of having planted tiny microphones inside IBM Selectric typewriters to record the striking of the type ball as it hit paper to determine which key was pressed. Other old-school side-channel hacks include filming and analyzing the blinking lights on old modems or external hard drives. Bad guys have since used side-channel attacks to steal pay TV streams and cars and break into phones.
Modern-day side-channel attacks now take the form of reading the activity of processors, memory or networking ports. The recent and massive shift of computing to cloud services such as Amazon EC2 or Microsoft Azure initially raised fears that hackers would be able to spy among virtual machines shared on the same servers (which is how clouds get their cost efficiencies), but apart from research done in 2009 showing that it is hypothetically possible for one virtual machine to spy on another by studying how it uses computing cycles, so far there haven’t been any publicly confirmed side-channel attacks by bad guys in the cloud. Amazon tried to downplay the 2009 report by researchers at MIT and UC-San Diego.

While it’s difficult to launch a side-channel attacks in a secured cloud, it would be far easier on the open web. A handful of security researchers have already proven various techniques, a recent one of which used a radio receiver to steal cryptographic keys from a computer sitting a few feet away. Yuval Yarom, a researcher from the University of Adelaide, Australia, last year presented a way to use a cache memory side-channel attack to steal a victim’s Bitcoin secret key after observing about 25 Bitcoin transactions.
The Columbia researchers, Yossef Oren, Vasileios Kemerlis, Simha Sethumadhavan and Angelos Keromytis, used the same technical method as Yarom but focused on how such an attack could be built into a simple Web page to hit the most amount of users as possible—without being detected.

Cybersecurity At RSA


You could tell by the din that the RSA Conference in San Francisco this week is the largest enterprise IT security confab in the world. The fact that several prominent breaches over the last year have shaken the C-suite out of its ostrichlike complacency clearly turned the volume up on this show all the way to eleven. So now money seems to be flowing into IT security like never before, adding to the commotion.
The big question: with all this security gear from the many hundreds of vendors exhibiting at the conference, each trying to get their message heard above the clamor, why do the hackers appear to be winning? Clearly, tools aren’t enough – even when they’re arguably better than ever.
Regardless, the RSA Conference is largely about the tools and technologies – where each tool addresses some corner of the security sphere. Here are my picks for some of the most interesting (in alphabetical order, so as not to play favorites). Are they sufficient? You be the judge.


CA Technologies / As the largest vendor on this list, CA Technologies was predictably showing off a number of security products. The one tool that caught my eye is their secure API management tool, which joined the CA family through the 2013 Layer 7 Technologies acquisition. Today, this product has moved well beyond its XML appliance roots to a user-friendly tool for handing all the security around APIs, so that developers don’t have to worry about the nuts and bolts when publishing their software interfaces.
Certes Networks / Once hackers penetrate a corporate network, they typically sneak around from place to place, seeking further vulnerabilities until they happen upon their goal, which is typically data they’d like to steal. Certes Networks aims to slow down this behavior by leveraging sophisticated encryption to compartmentalize the network. Different segments of the LAN or WAN have separate keys, preventing hackers from moving around easily.
Contrast Security – Contrast Security takes a page out of the agent-oriented playbook of Application Intelligence vendors like AppDynamics and New Relic, leveraging agents scattered about the network to identify vulnerability patterns in code. Customers primarily use contrast security for development and test environments that leverage Java, .Net, and Adobe Systems Cold Fusion languages, but the technology also works in the production environment. The Contrast Security plugin for Eclipse will alert developers when they introduce vulnerabilities that might allow common attacks like SQL injection, thus preventing those vulnerabilities from reaching the production environment in the first place.
CrowdStrike – CrowdStrike is one of a handful of vendors who seek to detect adversaries once they’re already on your network by uncovering indicators of attack (IOA) and indicators of compromise (IOC). These indicators are essentially breadcrumbs that hackers leave behind as they probe for vulnerabilities. The trick to detecting them is that individually they may not raise red flags, so tools like CrowdStrike must look for suspicious patterns – at least until the hackers figure out how to avoid leaving breadcrumbs.