samedi 2 mai 2015

Research Supports Starting Kindergarten Early for Advanced Children

Over the years, it has routinely been contested that skipping grades and starting kindergarten early is the best for children who are advanced. Research, however, suggests that advanced children need the challenge early on, and that districts must adapt to optimize results.
For children who skip grades (currently less than 2 percent of all students "[e]ducation researchers generally refer to them as 'accelerated.' It's a catch-all term to describe students who have either entered kindergarten early, grade-skipped or taken single subjects above grade level," according to NPR.
Though it's uncommon for children to skip grades and start early, two new reports from the past few weeks suggest that this should change.
Researchers from the University of Iowa found in their report 'A Nation Empowered' that decades of research conclude acceleration has a positive impact on students, but is constrained by state policies.
To further elaborate on how state policies do more harm than the intended good, a report from the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation "notes that 20 states specifically prohibit children from entering kindergarten early," according to NPR.
And for states that don't prohibit whole grade-skipping, they have extensive testing requirements that make the process a challenge. This second report focuses specifically on the disadvantages low-income, gifted students face when such constraints hold them back.
Part of the reason behind schools' deterring advanced students from skipping ahead is because many involved are worry that the challenge of keeping up with older children then sets them back.
But research indicates this might not be a long-term issue: "A 2006 study found that the youngest students in a given class, at first, do indeed struggle to keep up. But as time goes on, differences in achievement fade away," the article said.
Indeed, the alternative to keeping advanced students from getting ahead could be disengaging them.
"Tracy Cross, the president of the National Association of Gifted Children (NAGC) and a contributor to the 'A Nation Empowered' report, said that when high-achieving children aren't challenged, they get bored and run the risk of becoming disengaged."

vendredi 1 mai 2015

Top 4 Websites To Sell Your Old iPhone For the Most Money


Whether you want to sell your old iPhone, or buy a used iPhone to save money instead of buying one that is brand new, you will need to shop around until you find the sites that offer the best deals. After all, if you are selling, you want to get the most money possible, and if you are buying, you want to get the best savings. Here are the top five websites where you can sell and buy older iPhones and make or save money.

1. Craigslist

You can buy and sell old iPhones for anywhere from $70 to $800, depending on the age and condition of the phone. The only problem with Craigslist is that you need to be careful about who you are dealing with, because no one is screened. Completing the deal in a public place is always recommended for your safety. Craigslist is free and easy to use. All you have to do is post your ad with all of the pertinent information (including contact information) and photos of the item. You can get great deals if you are looking to buy an older phone, and you can often get top dollar when you are selling an iPhone.

2. Sell My iPhone

Sell your old iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iPhone 5 or iPhone 5C quickly and easily at this website. You will receive accurate quotes, and after the phone is delivered to Gadget Salvation, you will receive payment within a day or two. Simply send in the phone (for free), and an inspection will be performed. Within 48 hours, you will receive confirmation about the sale, and the payment will be issued.

3. Amazon

One of the best options is the Trade-In program from Amazon. No matter what the age of your iPhone is, you are going to make some money. All you have to do is a short Q&A on the type of phone you have, your carrier (if you have one), the condition, and if there are any accessories included. Then, you will get a flat rate from Amazon in the form of an Amazon gift card. It doesn’t get much simpler than that, and you can redeem the gift card for other items, including putting it toward a new iPhone. Another option is to act as an individual seller, but there is a bit more work involved because you will need to set up an account. But, you can choose your own selling price. When the item sells, you will have the money in your account within two to three weeks.

4. Best Buy

Earn anywhere from $5 to $310 for your old iPhone (depending on the model, condition, and accessories included) when you sell it to Best Buy. You can go online and get an estimate for what the company will pay for your iPhone. Then, simply print out the estimate and take it to a participating store in your area. You will receive a Best Buy gift certificate, which you can use towards the purchase of a new iPhone. Keep in mind that they do not take original iPhones

Sony Plays to Strengths in Games, Sensors as It Vows Revival

ONCE at the leading edge of consumer electronics, Sony Corp. is now more lumbering giant than trend-setter after falling behind competitors such as Samsung Electronics Co. and Apple Inc.
Sony watchers are urging the down-on-its-luck company to rediscover its pioneering ethos. Founded in 1946, Sony symbolized Japan's rebirth after its World War II defeat, rising from humble beginnings. It had little else besides the smarts of founders Masaru Ibuka and Akio Morita, to come up with hit after hit: the transistor radio, home tape recorders, the Walkman portable recorder-and-player.
In a sign of its travails, the Tokyo-based electronics and entertainment conglomerate Thursday reported a net loss of 126 billion yen ($1.1 billion) for the fiscal year through March, almost as bad as the 128.4 billion yen loss it racked up the previous fiscal year. Annual sales rose nearly 6 percent to 8.2 trillion yen.
Sony is forecasting a return to profit at 140 billion yen ($1.2 billion) for the fiscal year through March 2016. It is seeking to rebuild its operations around its strengths. Here's what's ailing and promising in Sony's business areas:
Televisions
Back in the 1960s, Sony dominated in TVs with its own technology called Trinitron, which boasted such a reputation for image quality it won an Emmy Award in 1973. But Sony underestimated the industry's switch to flat-panel TVs from CRT, or cathode-ray tubes. Sony has lost money in its TV business for the past decade. Samsung of South Korea leads with about a third of the global TV market share, followed by LG Electronics. Sony trails with under a tenth of the market. Last year, Sony split off the TV division as a wholly owned entity. And it's banking on 4K, with image quality superior to high-definition, or "ultra-HD," each set costing as much as $25,000. The problem: Rivals are all working on the same.
"Sony management keeps saying the electronics market is shrinking. But that's a given. Sony in the past came up with products that created new product sectors," said Yasunori Tateishi, who has written a book on Sony's woes.
Image Sensors
Image sensors are used in devices such as smartphones, digital cameras, medical devices and self-parking cars, and translate the information of a pictorial image into digital signals. Sony's sensor technology, known as CMOS, was years in the making and its development was expensive, causing the division to post years of losses. Sony might be finally ready to cash in on the investment. It is moving aggressively into high-end video cameras and SLR, or single-lens reflex, cameras, underpricing powerful Japanese rivals Nikon and Canon.
Sony's latest cameras can take smooth video of fast-moving objects and shoot video where there is almost no light. Although smartphones have eroded Sony's Cyber-shot digital camera business, Sony is now wooing professional and upscale amateur photographers. Sony also acquired a 20 percent stake in medical equipment maker Olympus Corp. in 2012, to develop endoscopes and other surgical tools packed with Sony technology, such as three-dimensional imaging and 4K.
Kazunori Ito, analyst at Barclays in Tokyo, believes that image sensors, along with games, can be counted on to be the new profit drivers for Sony, at a time when restructuring charges are winding down. The cameras are drawing new fans, including Havard Ferstad, a 34-year-old IT consultant and Tokyo resident, who has bought a 200,000 yen ($2,000) Sony camera. "The thing is that Sony has high quality sensors in their still cameras, and they are giving it to consumers at a relatively low price," he said.
Game Machines
The first PlayStation video game home console, which went on sale in Japan in 1994 and in the U.S. in 1995, has been a hit. With three successors already out, there is almost certain to be a fifth, or PS5. Sony has also delivered popular hand-held machines, starting with the PlayStation Portable, discontinued last year, and the PS Vita.
Sony has only two major rivals in the game-machine business: Nintendo Co. and Microsoft  Corp. The PlayStation 4 is at the top, and the PlayStation Network, which has more than 100 million registered accounts worldwide, relays content and services, including games, streaming video, TV shows and chats. The game-networking platform will extend to more devices, such as TVs and tablets. In the U.S., Sony recently entered the pay-television business with an online package of more than 50 channels starting at $50 a month, called PlayStation Vue, for PlayStation owners in three cities.
"That's the power  of the PlayStation brand, a brand that has been cultivated over the course of 20 years as the core gamers' system," said Jeffrey Wilson, senior analyst with PCMag.com, who points to "Final Fantasy VII" and "Metal Gear Solid 4" as strong exclusives. "Right now, Sony needs to give gamers what they signed up for when they purchased a PS4 -- a string of good games."
Entertainment
In 1995, Sony acquired Hollywood studio Columbia Pictures for $3.4 billion, which was widely criticized as over-priced. Norio Ohga, president at that time, was a former opera singer and musical connoisseur, with a vision to make Sony an entertainment company. Whenever Sony had a hit movie, such as the "Spider-Man series," or a popular musical release from artists like Beyonce and Daft Punk, that helped offset its losses in the electronics business.
But striking the right balance between electronics and entertainment has been difficult. In 2009, Howard Stringer, then Sony chief, scoffed at a reporter's question about whether Sony planned to produce material by Michael Jackson, a Sony artist who died that year, using 3-D technology. Sony later reversed course and produced 3-D versions of Jackson's music videos, including the post-mortem "This Is It."
Recently, Sony Pictures suffered from a hacking attack  over its movie called "The Interview," which spoofs an assassination of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. The film was released in independent theaters and through Internet outlets in December.
"Those interested in cinema and who watch Sony's films are primarily judging the company by the quality of the films they produce and release, so whether they sell electronics is not really on their minds," said Maggie Lee, a film critic for Variety. Lee said the hacking woes actually drew more interest in "The Interview," and she also had praise for "Coming Home," directed by Zhang Yimou and Sono Sion's "Shinjuku Swan" as strong recent offerings.
Robots
The Aibo entertainment robot, on which Sony pulled the plug in 2006 under a plan to cut costs, was a perfect example of the "synergy" that has been an elusive goal for decades, creatively bringing together two areas of Sony's expertise: entertainment and gadgetry. The mechanical pets, costing about $2,000 each, were programmed with a disarming "personality," drawing fiercely loyal fans. Never mind only 150,000 of the toy-poodle-sized toys were ever sold. They boosted Sony's image as an innovator that was more than about just money-making. Stringer's decision to kill Aibo set off an uproar from owners.
"Sony became too Americanized. It used to be a different kind of company," said Nobuyuki Norimatsu, nicknamed "Aibo doctor," of A-Fun, a company of engineers who do repairs for discontinued electronics goods. Last year, Sony ended maintenance services for Aibo. Norimatsu has a Buddhist priest chant prayers for the robotic spirits before taking an Aibo apart. It's that kind of caring and love Sony needs to reclaim, he said.

jeudi 30 avril 2015


How To Create A Website - Create A Website

Over the past few years, I have received countless emails from people who are looking for guidance on how to create a website. The truth is that we have been taught to believe that it is a complicated process. And you know what? It really USED to be. But it most certainly isn't anymore. We can now launch websites in a matter of 15 minutes. So if you are looking to create a website, this tutorial on how to create a website will be so helpful to you.



Hackers can steal fingerprints from a Galaxy S5

You may not be the only one swiping fingerprints on your Galaxy S5. Criminals could be doing it, too, and without your knowledge.
Researchers at FireEye discovered a serious flaw in some Androidphones — not just the Galaxy S5, though other affected models weren’t named. While fingerprint data is locked away in Android’s trusted storage area, the biometric scanner itself is exposed. With the right access, a criminal can perform a man-in-the-middle attack and siphon off scans while they’re in transit.
Resident malware does the dirty work silently in the background. Once criminals have acquired those tasty bits, “you can generate the image of [the] fingerprint,” Yulong Zhang explained. He added “after that you can do whatever you want.”

 Galaxy s5

Scary, right? It would be, if not for a few important caveats. First, this particular flaw was fixed in Android 5.0. Most new devices are shipping with Lollipop pre-installed, and it’s been rolling out to more older devices lately. If your carrier has already updated your handset, you’re good.
Second, FireEye’s researchers say that an attacker needs to be able to “break the kernel” in order to gain the required access to a phone’s fingerprint scanner. Unless you’ve rooted your device, you probably aren’t in harm’s way when it comes to this particular exploit.
That malware would also have to find its way onto your phone somehow, and if you’re only installing apps from the Play Store the chances of that happening are pretty slim. Samsung is, nevertheless, investigating FireEye’s claims.
As worrisome as this exploit is, it’s much scarier to think that someone with access to the right lab equipment can reproduce your fingerprint with nothing more than a photo they found on the Internet.

Wireless Phone Service from Google Challenges Major Carriers

Google is trying to shake up the wireless phone industry with a low-priced service designed to pressure major carriers into making it more affordable for people to get online and use Google's services.
The service, called "Project Fi," debuted Wednesday, about two months after Google revealed its plans to expand its ever-growing empire into providing wireless connections for smartphones.
Google Inc. is selling the basic phone service for $20 a month and will only charge customers for the amount of cellular data that they use each month, instead of a flat rate. Each gigabyte of data will cost $10 a month. That means a customer could sign up for a plan offering three gigabytes of data and get $20 back if only one gigabyte was used in a month.
Most wireless phone carriers allow their customers to roll over unused data into another month of service without refunding any money.
Project Wi-Fi initially will only be sold to a narrow audience that owns the Nexus 6, a smartphone that Motorola Mobility made with Google's help.
Google's pricing setup makes Project Fi less expensive than most of the comparable plans offering by the four biggest wireless phone carriers -- Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint. The monthly prices for a single line of smartphone service with up to one gigabyte of cellular data at those carriers range from $45 to $50 compared to $30 from Google, before subtracting any potential credits for unused data.
The major carriers, though, offer a variety of family plans that could still be better deals than Project Fi. Those bundled plans allow several phone lines to share a pool of cellular data.
Besides trying to bring down the prices of wireless phone plans, Google is promising subscribers that their Nexus 6 model will automatically connect with the fastest network  available.
Rather than building its own network, Google is leasing space on cellular towers built by Sprint and T-Mobile, which are hoping the deals will boost their profits without costing them too many customers tempted to defect to Project Fi. Google is promising Project Fi will automatically switch over to an available Wi-Fi network if that is running at a higher speed than the cellular alternatives.
"As mobile devices continually improve how you connect to people and information, it's important that wireless connectivity and communication keep pace and be fast everywhere, easy to use, and accessible to everyone," Nick Fox, the Google executive overseeing Project Fi, wrote in Wednesday blog post.
T-Mobile CEO John Legere, whose company already has been cutting its prices and rolling out new options, said it was a "no-brainer" to work with Google on Project Fi.
"Anything that shakes up the industry status quo is a good thing -- for both US wireless customers and T-Mobile," Legere wrote in a blog post.
Google has an incentive to promote cheaper and faster wireless service because it operates some of the world's most popular online services, including its search engine, maps, Gmail and YouTube video site. The Mountain View, California, company believes most people will visit those services more frequently if they are enticed to stay online for longer periods, giving Google more opportunities to show the digital ads that generate most of its revenue.
Similar motives prompted Google to begin building high-speed, hard-wired networks capable of navigating the Internet at speeds up to 100 times faster than existing broadband services. Although Google is only selling its broadband service in a handful of U.S. cities so far, AT&T and Comcast are now offering options with comparable speeds in a few communities.

Facebook Messenger


 Facebook Messenger app familiar to users of the social networking site is now available as a standalone Web site service. Facebook launched Messenger.com, which still requires an active Facebook account to use, on Wednesday.
Why roll out a separate Web site for a service that is already easily accessible to Facebook users? By focusing on Messenger services only, the new site eliminates the other features of Facebook that can prove distracting, especially the time-eating News Feed.
"Once logged in, people can dive directly into a dedicated desktop messaging experience, keeping their conversations going and picking up where they left off," a Facebook spokesperson told us.
For now, the social networking giant reportedly has no plans to sever the online Messenger completely from its main site, as the Messenger service remains available via Facebook as well. Mobile Facebook users, on the other hand, must download a separate app to use Messenger on their cellphones and other portable devices.
New Ambitions Unveiled at F8
Facebook lifted the veil off its new Messenger ambitions during last month's F8 developers' conference in San Francisco. During that event, it announced the launch of both Messenger Platform and Messenger Business.
Messenger Business, which has its own page on the new Messenger Web site but has yet to formally launch, is designed to be a one-stop communication destination for companies looking to better engage with their customers. Once the service goes live, it will enable businesses to send information and updates in real time to customers throughout the browsing, buying, shipping and delivery processes.
Messenger Platform, meanwhile, will support a wide range of new apps for Messenger's estimated 600 million users. Aimed at providing new app opportunities for developers, Messenger Platform already features a slew of new communication-enhancing apps, from voice changers and meme generators to content from ESPN and The Weather Channel.
More Languages Coming Soon
The rollout of Messenger as a separate Web-based offering reflects Facebook's new status, described at F8, as a "family of apps" rather than a single site with a variety of social networking applications in one place. CEO Mark Zuckerberg noted during the conference that the company's long-term goal is to enable everybody around the world to connect with one another in a variety of ways.
Zuckerberg said that the "new wave of expression" will include Facebook and a growing family of apps, as well as interactive tools and (eventually) even virtual-reality software .
The English-language version of the new Messenger Web site officially opened for business globally on Wednesday. Facebook plans to roll out support for additional languages over the next few weeks.
"This product is for people who use Messenger and who want a dedicated messaging experience on the Web," the Facebook spokesperson told us. "It's meant to be complementary to the Messenger mobile app, and to give you another option to message on your computer."

Going After the A-list /Businesses Pursue Celebrity Clients/


It's a dream for many small business owners: A-list celebrity clients. The owners of 5001 Flavors knew when they started the company 23 years ago they wanted to sell custom-made clothes to rap and R&B musicians. They sought out artists and record company executives at parties and music industry events. They looked in particular for up-and-coming artists. Now musicians like R. Kelly and Kid Rock are among their fans.
"We were able to really work with a lot of artists and help them go from obscurity to fame," says Sharene Wood, CEO of New York-based 5001 Flavors.
Some businesses court celebrities because they want to be part of the excitement of the entertainment industry or sports, and perhaps become well-known themselves. For other businesses, a famous client can bring publicity and a bump up in overall sales.
Just one or two celebrity clients can help a small business build a high-profile customer base.
"Once you're 'in', a lot of it takes care of itself," says Brian Menickella, a financial adviser in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, who works with professional athletes including Los Angeles Angels centerfielder Mike Trout.
Menickella, co-owner of The Beacon Group, networked his way into advising athletes, attending baseball tournaments and befriending college coaches and sports agents.
Right Time, Right Industry
5001 Flowers launched in the early 1990s, when the hip-hop music industry was thriving and artists needed unique looks for CD album covers and videos, CEO Wood says. 5001 Flavors' designs included leather jackets, hats, shirts and accessories.
The company's designs, strategy and timing were right, Wood says.
Some of the artists eventually started their own record labels and brought more singers to the company's list of celebrity clients. Because 5001 Flavors is well known in the music industry, athletes and actors have also bought its clothes.
"One client can turn into 10. Ten can turn into a 100 in a year," Wood says.
Moving Furniture, Fooling Paparazzi


NorthStar Moving Co. began getting celebrity clients soon after the Los Angeles-based company was founded 20 years ago, owner Laura McHolm says. It has done work for production companies, and that has helped bring it many clients in entertainment; Holm estimates 15 percent of NorthStar's work comes from the industry.

New Browser Hack Can Spy On Eight Out Of Ten PCs






A group of Columbia University security researchers have uncovered a new and insidious way for a hacker to spy on a computer, Web app or virtual machine running in the cloud without being detected. Any computer running a late-model Intel microprocessor and a Web browser using HTML5 (i.e., 80% of all PCs in the world) is vulnerable to this attack.
The exploit, which the researchers are calling “the spy in the sandbox,” requires little in the way of cost or time on the part of the attacker; there’s nothing to install and no need to break into hardened systems. All a hacker has to do is lure a victim to an untrusted web page with content controlled by the attacker. Once there, the software inside the bogus content launches a program that  manipulates how data moves in and out of a victim PC’s cache, which is the part of the CPU that serves as the intermediary between the high-speed central processor and the lower-speed random access memory or RAM.

The exploit then records the time it takes for the victim’s PC to run various operations in the cache memory, using the browser’s own high-resolution timers (we’re talking nanoseconds here). By studying the time it takes for memory access to take place, the hacker can get an accurate picture about a user’s browser history, keystrokes and mouse movements. The attack is more for spying than theft: it doesn’t steal any data or passwords or corrupt the victim’s machine.

The “spy in the sandbox” is what’s known as a side-channel attack, which is one of the older tricks in the hacker’s black bag. Such an attack usually involves interpreting what’s going inside a computer guts by measuring physical outputs such as sound, electromagnetic radiation or power consumption. In the 1980s, Soviet spies reportedly were suspected of having planted tiny microphones inside IBM Selectric typewriters to record the striking of the type ball as it hit paper to determine which key was pressed. Other old-school side-channel hacks include filming and analyzing the blinking lights on old modems or external hard drives. Bad guys have since used side-channel attacks to steal pay TV streams and cars and break into phones.
Modern-day side-channel attacks now take the form of reading the activity of processors, memory or networking ports. The recent and massive shift of computing to cloud services such as Amazon EC2 or Microsoft Azure initially raised fears that hackers would be able to spy among virtual machines shared on the same servers (which is how clouds get their cost efficiencies), but apart from research done in 2009 showing that it is hypothetically possible for one virtual machine to spy on another by studying how it uses computing cycles, so far there haven’t been any publicly confirmed side-channel attacks by bad guys in the cloud. Amazon tried to downplay the 2009 report by researchers at MIT and UC-San Diego.

While it’s difficult to launch a side-channel attacks in a secured cloud, it would be far easier on the open web. A handful of security researchers have already proven various techniques, a recent one of which used a radio receiver to steal cryptographic keys from a computer sitting a few feet away. Yuval Yarom, a researcher from the University of Adelaide, Australia, last year presented a way to use a cache memory side-channel attack to steal a victim’s Bitcoin secret key after observing about 25 Bitcoin transactions.
The Columbia researchers, Yossef Oren, Vasileios Kemerlis, Simha Sethumadhavan and Angelos Keromytis, used the same technical method as Yarom but focused on how such an attack could be built into a simple Web page to hit the most amount of users as possible—without being detected.

Cybersecurity At RSA


You could tell by the din that the RSA Conference in San Francisco this week is the largest enterprise IT security confab in the world. The fact that several prominent breaches over the last year have shaken the C-suite out of its ostrichlike complacency clearly turned the volume up on this show all the way to eleven. So now money seems to be flowing into IT security like never before, adding to the commotion.
The big question: with all this security gear from the many hundreds of vendors exhibiting at the conference, each trying to get their message heard above the clamor, why do the hackers appear to be winning? Clearly, tools aren’t enough – even when they’re arguably better than ever.
Regardless, the RSA Conference is largely about the tools and technologies – where each tool addresses some corner of the security sphere. Here are my picks for some of the most interesting (in alphabetical order, so as not to play favorites). Are they sufficient? You be the judge.


CA Technologies / As the largest vendor on this list, CA Technologies was predictably showing off a number of security products. The one tool that caught my eye is their secure API management tool, which joined the CA family through the 2013 Layer 7 Technologies acquisition. Today, this product has moved well beyond its XML appliance roots to a user-friendly tool for handing all the security around APIs, so that developers don’t have to worry about the nuts and bolts when publishing their software interfaces.
Certes Networks / Once hackers penetrate a corporate network, they typically sneak around from place to place, seeking further vulnerabilities until they happen upon their goal, which is typically data they’d like to steal. Certes Networks aims to slow down this behavior by leveraging sophisticated encryption to compartmentalize the network. Different segments of the LAN or WAN have separate keys, preventing hackers from moving around easily.
Contrast Security – Contrast Security takes a page out of the agent-oriented playbook of Application Intelligence vendors like AppDynamics and New Relic, leveraging agents scattered about the network to identify vulnerability patterns in code. Customers primarily use contrast security for development and test environments that leverage Java, .Net, and Adobe Systems Cold Fusion languages, but the technology also works in the production environment. The Contrast Security plugin for Eclipse will alert developers when they introduce vulnerabilities that might allow common attacks like SQL injection, thus preventing those vulnerabilities from reaching the production environment in the first place.
CrowdStrike – CrowdStrike is one of a handful of vendors who seek to detect adversaries once they’re already on your network by uncovering indicators of attack (IOA) and indicators of compromise (IOC). These indicators are essentially breadcrumbs that hackers leave behind as they probe for vulnerabilities. The trick to detecting them is that individually they may not raise red flags, so tools like CrowdStrike must look for suspicious patterns – at least until the hackers figure out how to avoid leaving breadcrumbs.

From Kaspersky To Webroot, Major Security Firms Can't Even Get Basic Android Encryption Right


When recently-appointed president of RSA, Amit Yoran, opened his company’s flagship conference yesterday, he warned the security industry was living in the dark ages. Protections just aren’t working, he said. Various anti-virus firms, including big names like Kaspersky and Webroot, have offered proof that the market’s many players get it wrong; they’re on a list of companies whose Google Play Android apps don’t do proper encryption checks, according to research from the Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) at Carnegie Mellon’s Software Engineering Institute.

The CERT discovered a whopping 22,000 apps that weren’t carrying out “SSL validation”, where the software is supposed to check certificates over encrypted communications to ensure the parties involved are verified. Kaspersky’s Internet Security app and Webroot’s free offering and its “complete” tool (an apt name, perhaps?) both failed to carry out these checks, meaning an attacker sitting on the same network as a target user could, in theory, spoof those services and collect data the victim hands over to the fake application. That could be credit card data, especially where in-app purchases are taking place, as in both Kaspersky and Webroot anti-virus, or usernames and passwords. Users would understandably assume that apps using encryption were safe, so would likely be oblivious to such “man-in-the-middle” attacks.




Microsoft loses ~12 cents on every phone sold

Despite hitting a record 10 million sales in the second quarter of 2015, Microsoft's phone division is in trouble. Competitors, including Apple and Google, are pushing the envelope even further, leaving Microsoft in the dust. Redmond has seemingly chosen to produce only low-end phones with a flagship phone conspicuously absent from the current lineup.
A filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission highlights just how bad things have become. Microsoft acquired Nokia back in 2013 for around $7.2 billion (a figure which has since risen to over $9 billion, according to the filing) and the division, named "Phone Hardware", brought in $1.4 billion in Q3 2015 with the cost of revenue exceeding that figure by $4 million. This means that Microsoft lost around 12 cents per phone according to analysts, even before R&D costs, among other expenses, are applied, despite exceptional unit sales.
The filing talks of a potent write-off of the Nokia acquisition, too. Microsoft describes a "potentially material charge to earnings" as "impairment adjustment is required" due to "[d]eclines in expected future cash flows, reduction in future unit volume growth rates, or an increase in the risk-adjusted discount rate used to estimate the fair value of the Phone Hardware reporting unit." This wording is similar to that which Microsoft issued before taking a $6.2 billion write-off of its aQuantive acquisition.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella described a need to "take further action to reduce our costs across devices as we execute on our Windows 10 first-party hardware plans." According to ComputerWorld, Microsoft does its impairment calculations in May, factoring them into its April to June quarter and so if a write-off occurs it would be announced in July.
to buy



First Look: HP Spectre x360


HP’s stunning new Spectre x360 gives Windows fans reason to cheer: It’s a premium transforming, multi-touch Ultrabook that doesn’t ape the MacBook Air’s styling but does deliver stellar performance and battery life. Best of all, perhaps, the Spectre x360 won’t set you back the $2000+ that other premium Windows Ultrabooks currently demand: it starts at less than half that heady sum.

I’ve been using an HP Spectre x360 since last week, and it appears that HP has successfully done for the high-end of the market what Stream did for the low-end: Revitalize HP’s PC reputation by delivering an awesome combination of power, style, and value. Readers know I’m always looking for the best values in technology. And this Spectre delivers.

Let’s start with the industrial. The Spectre x360 is precision milled and machine polished from aluminum and immediately presents the kind of understated elegance one might associate with Mercedes. It’s not a head-turner: indeed, on a recent trip I’m not sure that anyone even noticed I was using it. But the x360 is very clearly well-made, with a premium look and feel.

What’s most magical about the Spectre x360, however, is that it is very clearly a high-end Windows Ultrabook … until it isn’t. Thanks to its unique hinge design, you can rotate the screen all the way back and use it, Yoga-like, in tent, presentation or tablet modes too.

It’s not the capability that’s unique—many modern PCs can transform like this—it’s that the hinges don’t protrude in any way and that the device is no thicker in tablet mode than it is when closed.

So with the Spectre x360, HP is getting right what Microsoft got wrong with Surface Pro 3. Microsoft’s device is “the tablet that can replace your laptop,” so it’s oriented as a tablet first, laptop second. HP’s Spectre x360 is a laptop that can also be a tablet, or other form factors. It is true to the primary use cases of PCs, and is the more efficient—better—PC.

In keeping with this PC focus, the HP Spectre x360 is outfitted with modern, mainstream Intel Core i5 and i7 processors, and not the somewhat compromised Core M processors we see on newer hybrid devices. It can be had with 4 GB or 8 GB of RAM. 128 to 512 GB SSD storage. There are three full-sized USB 3.0 ports—no strange mix of USB 2.0 and 3.0 here—and full-sized HDMI and miniDisplayPort (so the device can drive two external displays simultaneously), plus an SD card reader.

The display is gorgeous. HP provides two panels, Full HD (1920 x 1080 and Quad HD (2,560 x 1,440), both of which are 13.3-inches and provide 10 points of multi-touch.
The keyboard is sublime. This is an area in which I had pretty much drifted off, given how much island-style keyboards are so similar. But the HP’s keyboard has a rock-solid feel to it that has re-awoken my need for a great keyboard. It doesn’t look special, but when you start typing the difference is immediately obvious.

The trackpad had me worried: it is the weirdest, widest trackpad I’d ever seen, and as someone with big hands, I’m very leery of errant palm swipes ruining my typing. So far, so good though: Despite the curiously wide trackpad, this is one of the most reliable trackpad experiences I’ve had. I still prefer a mouse, personally, but as trackpads go this is one of the best.

I’m not testing this, but HP’s Pro Tablet Active Pen is also compatible with the Spectre x360.
But here’s where things get truly interesting. HP claims that the Spectre x360 can obtain 10 to 12.5 hours of battery life in real world conditions—not with the display dimmed down to non-viewability, and not in special lab conditions—a claim I am well on my way to verifying. On a recent flight, I used the Spectre x360 for three hours and as I closed the lid, I noted about 70 percent of battery life left.
As HP noted, the MacBook Air also delivers about 12 hours of battery life. But the Apple device has a much lower-resolution panel and does not support multi-touch nor provide any transforming capabilities. These are fair points, but I would counter that the MacBook Air is also a bit lighter (2.96 pounds vs. 3.3 pounds) and thinner, as you can see below.
Apple MacBook Air (top) and HP Spectre x360 (bottom)
And then there’s the pricing.

I’ve been shopping recently for a high-end Ultrabook to replace my aging 2012-era 15-inch Samsung Series 9, and I’ve had a few interesting possibilities—the Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro and ThinkPad X1 Carbon among them—come across my desk. But where these and other similar machines cost $1500 to $2200 as I’d configure them, the HP is quite reasonably priced.
The Spectre x360 will start shipping on March 15 with a starting price of $899 for a version with an Intel Core i5 processor, 4 GB of RAM, a 128 GB SSD, and a Full HD display. Step up to 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB SSD—the model I’m reviewing and the one I would spend my own money on—and you’re looking at just $999. This is literally half the price of the machines I’d been considering.
You can step up from there as well. For $1149, you can add a Core i7 processor. And then in early April, you’ll be able to step up to that Quad HD screen for $1399.
I’ll keep testing and will post my final review in a few weeks. But my initial response is over the moon. This could very well be the premium Ultrabook I’ve been looking for.
to buy